Optimized Methane Content Prediction Model for Biogas Production

Authors

  • Udechukwu John Abaraogu * Department of Civil Engineering, University of Uyo, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria.
  • Joachim C Osuagwu Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University Technology Oweri, Nigeria. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8750-3564
  • Robert O Onosakponome Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University Technology Oweri, Nigeria.
  • Ngozi Levi Nwakwasi Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University Technology Oweri, Nigeria.

https://doi.org/10.22105/jeee.v3i1.57

Abstract

Methane (CH₄) is a key component of biogas, playing a crucial role in renewable energy production. However, accurately predicting CH₄ yield from various feedstocks remains a challenge due to the complex interactions of multiple factors such as feedstock composition, temperature, pH, and retention time. This study developed an optimized CH₄ content prediction model using linear regression, incorporating key process variables to enhance prediction accuracy. The process of producing the biogas from mini-biodigester involves sourcing the feedstocks, mixing them with water to a suitable proportion, pouring the slurry mixture into the mini-biodigester while ensuring that the mini-biodigester is airtight, and allowing anaerobic bacteria to break down the waste. Data from 15 feedstock combinations were obtained using mini-biodigesters in a controlled laboratory environment and analyzed, integrating biogas composition data with environmental parameters. Initially, a basic regression model using only feedstock composition yielded a low predictive accuracy (R² = 0.117). However, after incorporating temperature, pH, and retention time, the optimized model significantly improved performance (R² = 0.968), indicating that these factors strongly influence CH₄ yield. The study further validates the model by comparing predicted and actual CH₄ content, demonstrating a high correlation between key parameters and CH₄ production. The model was deployed in an Excel-based tool for practical use, allowing real-time CH₄ content estimation for biogas plants. The findings underscore the importance of environmental factors in biogas optimization and provide a simple yet effective tool for CH₄ prediction, contributing to improved bioenergy production efficiency.

 

Keywords:

Biogas, Methane prediction, Linear regression, Feedstock optimization, Renewable energy

References

  1. [1] Weiland, P. (2010). Biogas production: Current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 85(4), 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7

  2. [2] Bazdidi Tehrani, F., Ebrahimi, A., & Azimi-Souran, R. (2025). Investigation of forced convection of a novel hybrid nanofluid containing NEPCM in a square microchannel: Application of single-phase and Eulerian-Eulerian two-phase models. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications, 86(11), 3845–3866. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2024.2305231

  3. [3] Kia, S., Jahangiri, A., & Ameri, M. (2026). Experimental analysis of a portable thermoelectric atmospheric water generator using conical condensers. Results in Engineering, 39. 110960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.110960

  4. [4] Raposo, F. D. L. R., De la Rubia, M. A., Fernández Cegrí, V., & Borja, R. (2012). Anaerobic digestion of solid organic substrates in batch mode: An overview relating to methane yields and experimental procedures. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 861-877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.008

  5. [5] Banks, C. J., Heaven, S., Zhang, Y., & Baier, U. (2018). Food waste digestion: Anaerobic digestion of food waste for a circular economy. https://task37.ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2022/02/Food_waste_WEB_END.pdf

  6. [6] Liu, C., Hu, B., Cheng, Y., Guo, Y., Yao, W., & Qian, H. (2021). Carotenoids from fungi and microalgae: A review on their recent production, extraction, and developments. Bioresource Technology, 337, 125398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125398

  7. [7] Vikromvarasiri, N., Koyama, M., Kurniawan, W., Pisutpaisal, N., & Nakasaki, K. (2023). Enhancing methane recovery by intermittent substrate feeding and microbial community response in anaerobic digestion of glycerol. Renewable Energy, 204, 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.002

  8. [8] Wang, L., Long, F., Liao, W., & Liu, H. (2020). Prediction of anaerobic digestion performance and identification of critical operational parameters using machine learning algorithms. Bioresource Technology, 298, 122495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122495

  9. [9] Abbasi, T., Tauseef, S. M., & Abbasi, S. A. (2011). Biogas energy. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1040-9

  10. [10] Dawood, F., Anda, M., & Shafiullah, G. M. (2020). Hydrogen production for energy: An overview. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(7), 3847–3869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.059

  11. [11] Angelidaki, I., Treu, L., Tsapekos, P., Luo, G., Campanaro, S., Wenzel, H., & Kougias, P. (2018). Biogas upgrading and utilization: Current status and perspectives. Biotechnology Advances, 36(2), 452–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.01.011

Published

2026-06-05

How to Cite

Abaraogu, U. J. ., Osuagwu, J. C. ., Onosakponome, R. O., & Nwakwasi, N. L. . (2026). Optimized Methane Content Prediction Model for Biogas Production. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Energy, 3(2), 103-115. https://doi.org/10.22105/jeee.v3i1.57

Similar Articles

21-25 of 25

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.